Try NFL Sport Channel Seach:
Selected searches:
NFL Football Players Draft Injuries Rookies Season SuperbowlPublished: June 16, 2009
Brett Favre sure sounded like he would be in a purple jersey on Sept. 13, 2009 when talking on HBO’s Joe Buck Live, which the Favre interview withstanding was quite possibly the worst hour on television ever viewed.
After really thinking about it, I am starting to believe that Favre signing to the Vikings actually may help the Bears win the division.
Favre claims Minnesota is a perfect fit because of “common terminology” used in the offense.
I do believe that the phrase “don’t force the ball into triple coverage” is the same in Minnesota as it was in New York.
Let’s look at who would be the Vikings QB if Favre stays retired.
A couple options are:
Tarvaris Jackson
T. Jack can run. To me, he would be more difficult to plan for defensively because of that added dimension.
Jackson (95.4) actually had a higher QB rating than Favre (81) did last year.
While only throwing for nine touchdowns, he also only threw two interceptions. He did fumble a couple times, be’s not as careless as Favre is.
Sage Rosenfels
Rosenfels QB rating (79.5) was less than two points from Favre’s.
Rosenfels turned the ball over a lot, including multiple fumbles in the fourth quarter of a single game against a divisional foe. He really is very bad. It’s safe to say that Favre would definitely do better than him.
Favre the Forcer
Even with Adrian Peterson, who is without a doubt, the scariest running back to watch run against your favorite team’s defense, gashing opposing defenses for limitless yards, Brett will still force the ball. That’s the only way he knows how to play.
It wasn’t a bad thing ten years ago, but the fact of the matter is that his arm simply is not strong enough.
After having his secret arm surgery, I don’t anticipate the arm strength even being the same as it was last season at the beginning of the year with the Jets.
Favre’s thirst for revenge to get back at Ted Thompson is driving this. That is his true motivation.
As a Bears’ fan, I’d be much more intimidated by a TJack-led Vikings team than a Favre-led team.
Published: June 11, 2009
The new Madden ratings are out. Let’s take a look at how EA has rated the Bears this year.
Let’s start with the Tight Ends and Wide Receivers.
WIDE RECEIVERS AND TIGHT ENDS | ||||||||||||||||||||
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | JMP | CAT | CAR | KR | ||||
82 | G. Olsen | CHI | TE | 82 | 85 | 87 | 64 | 85 | 78 | 85 | 85 | 91 | 89 | 85 | 70 | 5 | ||||
88 | D. Clark | CHI | TE | 79 | 70 | 82 | 68 | 77 | 85 | 78 | 82 | 88 | 85 | 82 | 70 | 8 | ||||
80 | E. Bennett | CHI | WR | 72 | 83 | 85 | 56 | 84 | 60 | 79 | 80 | 93 | 80 | 83 | 70 | 70 | ||||
23 | D. Hester | CHI | WR | 71 | 99 | 98 | 52 | 97 | 74 | 85 | 70 | 93 | 90 | 73 | 49 | 99 | ||||
81 | R. Davis | CHI | WR | 69 | 88 | 90 | 48 | 87 | 70 | 84 | 75 | 88 | 85 | 76 | 65 | 61 | ||||
17 | J. Iglesias | CHI | WR | 69 | 85 | 87 | 43 | 87 | 61 | 92 | 74 | 95 | 81 | 84 | 51 | 55 | ||||
87 | K. Davis | CHI | TE | 64 | 78 | 80 | 60 | 75 | 45 | 80 | 84 | 92 | 82 | 74 | 68 | 10 | ||||
13 | J. Knox | CHI | WR | 62 | 94 | 96 | 40 | 92 | 29 | 84 | 76 | 90 | 88 | 72 | 65 | 75 |
Earl Bennett is rated higher than Devin Hester? Huh? The dude hasn’t caught a ball yet. I hope Earl is as good as they rated him.
Everything else looks good except Rashied Davis’s catch rating. It should be 11, not 76. Watching him play last season was like being at Times Square at 11:59 on New Years Eve.
He couldn’t catch a cold.
I don’t think Iglesias should have a strength rating of 43 either.
Let’s move on to Running Backs.
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | RBK | PBK | CAT | CAR | KR | |||
22 | M. Forte | CHI | HB | 89 | 90 | 91 | 76 | 91 | 74 | 99 | 85 | 95 | 45 | 55 | 83 | 89 | 65 | |||
37 | J. McKie | CHI | FB | 82 | 67 | 70 | 80 | 65 | 88 | 80 | 78 | 86 | 65 | 55 | 64 | 74 | 45 | |||
27 | K. Jones | CHI | HB | 72 | 86 | 87 | 70 | 78 | 65 | 76 | 60 | 65 | 43 | 39 | 74 | 75 | 25 | |||
43 | J. Davis | CHI | FB | 70 | 84 | 84 | 76 | 78 | 55 | 72 | 75 | 86 | 52 | 46 | 80 | 76 | 40 | |||
29 | A. Peterson | CHI | HB | 69 | 80 | 85 | 73 | 76 | 69 | 81 | 71 | 71 | 22 | 23 | 70 | 76 | 63 | |||
25 | G. Wolfe | CHI | HB | 69 | 90 | 94 | 49 | 93 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 82 | 25 | 30 | 72 | 76 | 75 | |||
All in all, I think they got this one right. The Stamina of 99 for Forte is fantastic and deserved. With Jason Davis’ speed, I expect many will start him ahead of Jason McKie.
Kevin Jones took a hit, but he had very little production last year.
AP and Garrett Wolfe look about right also.
Next we move to the quarterbacks.
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | THP | THA | CAR | ||
6 | J. Cutler | CHI | QB | 87 | 70 | 74 | 70 | 70 | 77 | 90 | 85 | 95 | 97 | 85 | 65 | ||
12 | C. Hanie | CHI | QB | 45 | 66 | 66 | 56 | 64 | 36 | 92 | 84 | 93 | 80 | 66 | 66 |
I can’t argue with Cutler’s ratings. It seems fair.
Caleb is rated pretty low! I would have had him over 50 overall at least.
Absent from the list is Brett Basanez.
Now it’s time for the Offensive Lineman.
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | PBK | RBK | ||||||
76 | O. Pace | CHI | LT | 87 | 53 | 59 | 94 | 50 | 90 | 75 | 40 | 40 | 91 | 93 | ||||||
57 | O. Kreutz | CHI | C | 87 | 60 | 75 | 91 | 55 | 92 | 82 | 95 | 84 | 88 | 86 | ||||||
63 | R. Garza | CHI | RG | 80 | 49 | 67 | 91 | 53 | 78 | 70 | 85 | 88 | 87 | 89 | ||||||
78 | K. Shaffer | CHI | RT | 79 | 58 | 70 | 89 | 64 | 84 | 90 | 85 | 92 | 90 | 87 | ||||||
67 | J. Beekman | CHI | LG | 75 | 51 | 64 | 86 | 57 | 65 | 72 | 90 | 92 | 85 | 80 | ||||||
68 | F. Omiyale | CHI | RT | 74 | 52 | 64 | 92 | 49 | 75 | 60 | 85 | 85 | 87 | 79 | ||||||
74 | C. Williams | CHI | LT | 73 | 68 | 88 | 87 | 71 | 56 | 75 | 35 | 45 | 78 | 85 | ||||||
72 | D. Buenning | CHI | RG | 72 | 48 | 64 | 88 | 50 | 68 | 78 | 90 | 88 | 87 | 83 | ||||||
65 | P. Mannelly | CHI | C | 63 | 57 | 70 | 84 | 57 | 66 | 55 | 81 | 60 | 70 | 70 | ||||||
64 | T. Reed | CHI | LG | 60 | 47 | 58 | 86 | 46 | 61 | 64 | 75 | 86 | 80 | 76 | ||||||
Pat Mannelly fans may be a little disappointed. All joking aside, having Orlando Pace will be very nice when running on the left side with Forte. He should also help neutralize good pass rushing DE’s.
Olin dropped under 90 overall for the first time in a long time. I would have had Omiyale rated higher than Beekman.
Shaffer also seems overrated to me ratings-wise.
It’s time to go to defense.
The LB’S look like this.
LINEBACKERS | ||||||||||||||||||||
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | JMP | TCK | CAT | |||||
55 | L. Briggs | CHI | ROLB | 95 | 78 | 84 | 80 | 82 | 92 | 93 | 90 | 96 | 62 | 96 | 34 | |||||
54 | B. Urlacher | CHI | MLB | 94 | 85 | 90 | 77 | 87 | 95 | 98 | 97 | 93 | 81 | 93 | 60 | |||||
92 | H. Hillenmeyer | CHI | MLB | 68 | 70 | 78 | 74 | 73 | 70 | 78 | 75 | 90 | 60 | 83 | 27 | |||||
53 | N. Roach | CHI | LOLB | 68 | 83 | 82 | 67 | 76 | 60 | 86 | 85 | 80 | 70 | 73 | 50 | |||||
58 | M. Freeman | CHI | LOLB | 63 | 84 | 87 | 64 | 83 | 39 | 92 | 85 | 93 | 77 | 69 | 54 | |||||
52 | J. Williams | CHI | ROLB | 57 | 72 | 78 | 78 | 78 | 62 | 75 | 89 | 90 | 70 | 75 | 32 | |||||
90 | J. LaRocque | CHI | LOLB | 57 | 75 | 85 | 70 | 78 | 58 | 78 | 80 | 91 | 78 | 63 | 58 |
Briggs is rated higher than Urlacher, finally. It still feels that a 94 overall for Brian is far too high at this point of the year. Newly acquired Tinoisamoa is not on this list, but I anticipate him to be rated higher than 80 overall.
Is Urlacher really that much faster than Briggs at this point?
Let’s look at the big boys.
DEFENSIVE LINEMEN | ||||||||||||||||||||
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | JMP | TCK | CAT | |||||
91 | T. Harris | CHI | DT | 92 | 75 | 91 | 86 | 69 | 84 | 87 | 80 | 82 | 66 | 75 | 34 | |||||
93 | A. Ogunleye | CHI | LE | 83 | 78 | 90 | 73 | 79 | 82 | 70 | 78 | 84 | 58 | 74 | 35 | |||||
96 | A. Brown | CHI | RE | 78 | 78 | 88 | 74 | 75 | 67 | 70 | 85 | 94 | 67 | 70 | 39 | |||||
73 | J. Gilbert | CHI | DT | 72 | 67 | 87 | 80 | 72 | 50 | 60 | 77 | 95 | 80 | 72 | 28 | |||||
97 | M. Anderson | CHI | RE | 71 | 80 | 85 | 72 | 74 | 59 | 80 | 84 | 92 | 90 | 65 | 30 | |||||
98 | D. Dvoracek | CHI | DT | 69 | 64 | 76 | 88 | 63 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 70 | 67 | 80 | 35 | |||||
94 | M. Harrison | CHI | DT | 68 | 64 | 86 | 90 | 68 | 43 | 64 | 80 | 86 | 66 | 74 | 30 | |||||
95 | A. Adams | CHI | DT | 65 | 54 | 70 | 87 | 61 | 68 | 69 | 74 | 80 | 57 | 74 | 14 | |||||
71 | I. Idonije | CHI | LE | 65 | 65 | 76 | 80 | 64 | 68 | 69 | 80 | 88 | 52 | 65 | 25 | |||||
The obvious surprise is how highly Tommie Harris is rated. Hopefully they know something about Tommie that we don’t.
Also, I anticipated Marcus Harrison to be rated over Jarron Gilbert.
Izzie Idonije, in my opinion should have been rated higher than Mark Anderson due to his versatility and steady production last season.
The worst rated group in my opinion is coming up next with the DB’s.
DEFENSIVE BACKS | ||||||||||||||||||||
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | JMP | TCK | CAT | |||||
33 | C. Tillman | CHI | CB | 82 | 82 | 88 | 68 | 83 | 85 | 92 | 78 | 89 | 94 | 70 | 67 | |||||
36 | J. Bullocks | CHI | FS | 76 | 85 | 89 | 58 | 85 | 72 | 94 | 82 | 93 | 85 | 64 | 67 | |||||
44 | K. Payne | CHI | SS | 76 | 85 | 87 | 64 | 84 | 66 | 90 | 85 | 92 | 86 | 73 | 67 | |||||
31 | N. Vasher | CHI | CB | 75 | 85 | 86 | 45 | 90 | 76 | 92 | 84 | 90 | 84 | 35 | 80 | |||||
30 | D. Moore | CHI | CB | 74 | 87 | 88 | 48 | 97 | 56 | 95 | 84 | 94 | 92 | 47 | 78 | |||||
38 | D. Manning | CHI | FS | 70 | 88 | 92 | 60 | 88 | 64 | 90 | 86 | 93 | 91 | 60 | 57 | |||||
26 | T. McBride | CHI | CB | 65 | 86 | 89 | 55 | 90 | 61 | 92 | 79 | 94 | 87 | 48 | 51 | |||||
21 | C. Graham | CHI | CB | 60 | 83 | 87 | 48 | 84 | 59 | 90 | 75 | 88 | 84 | 35 | 64 | |||||
20 | C. Steltz | CHI | SS | 60 | 74 | 80 | 65 | 75 | 46 | 95 | 90 | 94 | 78 | 74 | 58 | |||||
35 | Z. Bowman | CHI | CB | 53 | 85 | 87 | 52 | 89 | 50 | 92 | 64 | 61 | 87 | 32 | 65 |
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Where do I begin here?
Really?
Josh Bullocks is rated over Vasher and Corey Graham. Corey Graham is a 60 overall??? I expected him to be a 70 at least.
Bullocks is far too high at 76.
According to this Mark Andersen is faster than Peanut Tillman. I think they really got the defensive backfield wrong.
Don’t worry, I didn’t forget about Robbie and Brad.
NUM | NAME | TM | POS | OVR | SPD | ACC | STR | AGL | AWR | STA | TGH | INJ | POW | ACR | |||
9 | R. Gould | CHI | K | 94 | 55 | 54 | 25 | 52 | 87 | 75 | 65 | 90 | 91 | 97 | |||
4 | B. Maynard | CHI | P | 77 | 49 | 48 | 31 | 40 | 96 | 93 | 60 | 85 | 82 | 90 |
Brad Maynard got jobbed! One of the best punters in the NFL deserves more than a 77 overall.
According to this, he could beat Robbie Gould easily in an arm wrestling match.
Speaking of arm, an arm reminds me of a leg.
A leg reminds me of turkey.
Looking at John Madden eating that delicious turducken is making me hungry.
I’m out of here.
Published: June 7, 2009
Fact: The Chicago Bears need a WR (who has more than zero career NFL receptions).
Fact: The Chicago Bears drafted 19984450.6 WRs (in reality three, plus one undrafted free agent) this year to address the need.
Fact: Even if you super-glued them all together to form one superhuman receiver named Juaquin Knoxkinderpeterman, they would not be as good as Plaxico Burress.
(Insert shooting or leg joke, or shooting in the leg joke here.)
Yes, I would like Plaxico Burress to be a Chicago Bear.
He can catch footballs.
He can run fast.
He can jump high.
He can make acrobatic plays.
He can push this team over the top.
Am I wrong to want this guy on my favorite football team despite his legal troubles?
The fact is, in a brilliant offseason by Jerry Angelo, this could be the icing on the cake. I believe the addition of Plax makes the Bears a lock for the NFC North and serious contenders for home field advantage.
While Burress would be an important piece of the puzzle, clearly there is someone else they should pursue as a two-for-one.
What will it take to land Plax?
Isn’t it obvious? The Bears need to make a run at fellow Michigan State University Alum Mateen Cleaves.
During his rookie NBA season, he played in 78 games, averaging 5.4 points and 2.7 assists. Now that stat line may not strike fear in the hearts of men, but there is one statistic still left to consider.
Mateen has equal the number of NFL receptions as 86.7 percent of the current Chicago Bears receiving corps. How scary is that!
While Cleaves is playing professional basketball in Greece, it should be an easy buy out for his contract.
The Bears are only two players away from NFL glory.
JA needs to make this happen.
Published: June 4, 2009
Hmm….
Brad Biggs writes in his daily blog (http://blogs.suntimes.com/bears):
“Team spokesman Scott Hagel said the Bears are exploring the possibility of adding a sponsorship patch to practice jerseys, a move first made by the Tennessee Titans at least a year ago. The NFL tackled the issue at the owners meetings in March and the league granted approval for teams to use patches measuring 3.5 inches by 4.5 inches on practice jerseys only. The Bears will likely approach companies they already partner with to explore the issue before then considering outside opportunities.”
It is rumored that the Bears would partner with Illinois Lottery for the practice jersey patch.
Nascar
I throw up in my mouth when I see the Nascar “athletes” with obnoxious Viagra, FedEx, McDonalds, and Orkin patches as they are interviewed on SportsCenter.
It would be different if Nascar had cool sponsors like Yoohoo (the delicious chocolate drink, not the search engine), Bleacher Report, Sonic the Hedgehog, or Yanni.
All Joking Aside, Or Not
In all seriousness, five years from now, will the NFL go the way of NFL Europe and allow corporate patches on game jerseys?
I think this opens up a can of worms, that as an NFL fan, I am not pleased with.
The Chicago Bears jersey is a classic jersey and while small modifications have been made through the years, the idea that there could eventually be a Depend patch on it, makes me sick. I would be embarrassed to go to road games with that on.
One corporate sponsor is already taken.
Kleenex will be sponsoring the Broncos for their practice jerseys since they just lost their franchise quarterback and many tears will be shed all season.
So I ask what sponsor(s) would you want the Bears to choose for their practice jersey patch?
Published: June 1, 2009
As a long time Chicago Bear fan, I would like to issue a memo to Bears fans.
The memo reads: “Dear Meatball Bears fans, relax.”
Not even two full months after the much maligned and ridiculed (by me in particular) Jerry Angelo pulls the strings on perhaps the biggest trade in Chicago Bears history, I read that small pockets of Bears fans are “alienated by Jay Cutler” because he refused to sign 1,000 autographs at Wrigley Field while taking in a Cubs game.
The fact that he can endure an entire Cubs game without vomiting proves he has a great amount of intestinal fortitude and should endear him to Chicago fans forever.
Hey, if he can win on Sundays, he can refuse to sign at Red Lobster after paying with a credit card for all I care.
The Culprits
I can picture who the “small pockets” of Bears fans who are complaining are. They are probably the “fire and passion” group.
You know the ones.
I am talking about the guys that call in to sports talk radio to complain that Lovie doesn’t have “the fire” and that they don’t believe there is anyone really on the other end of his headset.
They also complain that Brian Urlacher doesn’t show an adequate amount of “passion” and that they want him to be “angrier.”
A Solution
Hey, I bet Rex Grossman will sign all of your autographs. He will also fumble the snap from the center and often throw to people wearing jerseys that are not blue and orange (unless that week the Bears are playing the Broncos).
Signing autographs is nice, but a laser-armed franchise quarterback who has yet to reach his prime is better.
Plus, Jay showed the “fire and passion” when he wanted out of Denver.
If that doesn’t appease Meatball nation I don’t know what will.
Published: April 28, 2009
In the fifth round of the 2009 NFL Draft, the Chicago Bears chose WR Johnny Knox.
Knox is blazing fast. While coming from Abilene Christian, a D2 school, Knox put on quite a show at the NFL Combine.
The question is:
Should Jerry Angelo have chosen Johnny Knoxville instead?
Look at the resume:
Blasted with a fire hose.
Bitten by baby alligators.
Tall.
Shot by four men with paintball guns for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine.
Hit hard in the junk by a sledgehammer.
Won 100 yard dash in the Special Olympics for the movie “The Ringer.”
Has been punched in the face several times for “fun.”
He could go across the middle… and probably be the best option in the slot for the Bears right now.
Finally, let’s look at what the Bears’ current WR depth chart would look like with the gritty Knoxville on the roster.
1. Devin Hester
2. Joaquim Iglesias
3. Johnny Knoxville
4. Weeman
5. Party Boy (w/ boombox)
6. Rashied Davis
While the future for Knoxville in a Bears uniform looks bleak at best, it is possible he will still be invited to rookie mini-camp.