Try NFL Sport Channel Seach:
Selected searches:
NFL Football Players Draft Injuries Rookies Season Superbowl
Items by
The Terminator May Terminate an NFL Franchise
Published: October 28, 2009
No Comments
Last week, California Governor Arnold (Terminator) Schwarzenegger signed a bill allowing the construction of the new 75,000 seat ultra-luxury football stadium to be built by potential bidder, Majestic Realty Co.
Only they are not bidders, but thieves.
Majestic has publicly stated they are not interested in bidding for an expansion franchise but wants to steal an existing franchise from another city. They have seven known targets, perhaps more: Buffalo, Jacksonville, Minnesota, St. Louis, Oakland, San Francisco, and San Diego.
That’s bad news not only for fans in those cities, but for fans of every sport in North America.
Given the NFL’s burning desire to get back into the second largest market in the United States at any cost, it’s unlikely to put up any resistance to Majestic’s intentions, another slap in the face to the average fan of every sport in North America.
I say every sport, because this larceny will discourage building any new sports facilities, make governments hesitate before pledging public funds for these projects, and discourage grass root support for new teams.
Consider St. Louis, which is now the current home of the old Los Angeles Rams. They were once the home of the Arizona Cardinals but left for Phoenix in 1988 when the owners could not get a new stadium built.
After a few years, $280 million was spent to build the current domed stadium which can hold 70,000 people. The Rams arrived soon after.
If the Rams go back to Los Angeles, what does that mean for the $280 million including any taxpayer dollars that was spent? It will have been wasted.
That’s true for any publicly funded sports facility for any sport. Money that could have been given to food banks or some other worthy cause was spent on a league that turned its arrogant nose up when some prettier face came along.
If you are a taxpayer, would you want your money spent this way?
If you are a sports fan, would you want to invest your emotions and your time and money on a team that may leave town at any moment or blackmail you for an even more luxurious facility?
The new Los Angeles stadium is not a “people’s” stadium. It is one of the new kind of stadiums being built like Yankee Stadium or Dallas Stadium, facilities built with the rich and the corporations in mind.
The situation with Los Angeles has especially bitter ironies.
When the Rams and Raiders left in 1994, Los Angeles refused to whine and mourn like other cities like Oakland, Houston, Cleveland, etc. did when their NFL franchises were lost.
Los Angeles only yawned and there has been little active attempt to get a team back until now. In Los Angeles, the movie star, not the sports figure is king. Los Angeles is the only city to stand up to the NFL’s arrogance.
The NFL has never forgotten the insult, the only blemish on its spectacular rise since the 1960s. They’ve always yearned to get back to Los Angeles, the second largest market in the United States.
Ideally, they want two franchises there like the other major professional sports, but for now they’ll settle for one.
The NFL could head off this crisis by awarding Los Angeles an expansion franchise and start its path toward becoming a 40 team league, the next symmetrical number.
If they want to pair Los Angeles with another expansion team, that’s fine. In an earlier article on this subject, I listed at least eleven contenders. Picking one from the best three, San Antonio, Oklahoma City, and Portland shouldn’t be hard.
But I doubt if the arrogant NFL will do the honorable thing. Through Majestic, they can now blackmail those cities into building stadiums like Dallas, perhaps at taxpayers’ expense, or have them face losing their teams.
This is an arrogant league that lives in its own rarefied atmosphere. It has allowed so many of its teams to move without resistance in the past when someone offered even more unrealistic sums of money for a franchise. Gary Bettman, the defender of money-losing Phoenix, you’re heading the wrong league.
This is a league that refuses to modify its blackout policy, even with a job recession on, that allows another team (Buffalo) to play in another city because it has a wealthier market, that despises foreigners by charging outrageous ticket prices if it chooses to play a game in a local facility. The NFL has no loyalty to the fans who support it.
As to which team will move, I doubt if it will be the Rams which left an image of failure and incompetence behind when they left fifteen years ago.
The cruelest choice would be to move the 49ers from San Francisco. Los Angeles would like nothing better than to stick it to its arch rival city that heaped so many football humiliations on them in the 1980s. But the Los Angeles 49ers?
Minnesota? The Los Angeles Vikings? That’s too jarring too.
So the other four are probably the leading choices.
A renamed Bills shifted from Buffalo is a probable choice. They already play one game in Canada’s most glamorous market, Toronto. The NFL won’t shed any tears for unglamorous Buffalo.
Oakland is another leading city. Al Davis has had wet dreams fantasizing about a stadium like Los Angeles. He’s done it once and he won’t hesitate to move the Raiders to Los Angeles again. And the Raiders have a sexy image that resonates with Hollywood’s elite. So much for the image of a tough team from a tough town.
San Diego, the poor man’s Los Angeles would be a top contender especially since it doesn’t have to move far to its new home.
Finally there is Jacksonville, a city that doesn’t sell out and is the least sexy of Florida’s teams.
But thanks to the Terminator, fans in those cities won’t sleep easily until this is over. Which franchise will be terminated? Let the piracy begin!
Read more NFL news on BleacherReport.com
The Buffalo Bills Could End Up In The CFL
Published: August 1, 2009
No Comments
“Ladies, and gentleman, I would like to present the winner of the Grey Cup, this year… Buffalo!”
Although the idea of a CFL commissioner making such a statement in the future seems far fetched, if not impossible to imagine, the ground work is now being laid for such a thing to actually happen. Here’s the scenario that could lead to such an event.
Currently, Los Angeles (if it survives the court challenges) wants to build an ultra-luxurious 75,000 seat stadium like the new Yankee Stadium or the one opening in Dallas.
The builders have publicly stated they don’t want an expansion franchise but want to steal an established team.
Many potential franchises have already been targeted: Jacksonville, San Diego, Minnesota, San Francisco, Oakland, and…Buffalo.
The NFL has been dying to get back into Los Angeles ever since it was ignominiously sent packing fifteen years ago; the league would prefer two teams, like all the other “big four” American sports.
There has been no talk of expansion and many readers on Bleacher Report have pointed out that the NFL would prefer to keep its symmetrical quota of 32 teams.
(I think it will move inevitably to another symmetrical point of 40.)
Assuming that the NFL doesn’t want to expand and wants to get back into Los Angeles at almost any cost, it is prepared to let one of its franchises move from its existing city, preferably the least glamorous one.
Which franchise is that? You got it, the Buffalo Bills.
The NFL has already shown that they don’t care much for Buffalo by allowing its owner, Ralph Wilson to play games in Toronto.
“But,” say the mindless, NFL-worshiping, Toronto fans, “That means that it is only a matter of time before the Bills come here!”
Sorry, chumps. The NFL won’t be coming any time in the near future, certainly not the Bills.
The NFL has consistently shown how it regards foreigners everywhere it plays outside the United States:
Price gouging (particularly in the current Toronto deal), minor league status (NFL Europe), and unglamorous games (San Francisco vs Arizona in Mexico when both teams were bad, the previously cellar dwelling Miami Dolphins last year in Toronto, and the New York Jets this year instead of Indianapolis).
The NFL despises foreigners. It considers it a “privilege” for them to watch NFL games in their own cities.
All the NFL wants in Toronto is to play exhibitions and one or two regular season games with monopolistic ticket prices, and to peddle merchandise.
The last thing the NFL wants is another Blue Jays, a “foreign” team whose TV audience can’t be counted by American networks in the ratings and who are the worst draw in baseball because they are not an American city.
On the other hand, if the NFL is prepared to allow Los Angeles to “steal” one of its existing franchises, Buffalo is that city.
If I was betting on who would be the first to offer themselves to Los Angeles, once all the hurdles to building that new stadium are cleared, I’d bet on either Ralph Wilson or Al Davis.
Unlike Houston and Cleveland, whose public tears persuaded the NFL to grant a consoling expansion franchise, Buffalo and Oakland are likely to be treated like St. Louis and Baltimore—who got nothing when the Cardinals and Colts left. The NFL won’t shed any tears for Buffalo and Oakland’s fans.
Let’s assume the worst happens and Buffalo is left without a franchise. That leaves the entire north of New York State without a team.
Enter the CFL. There has already been talk by ex-NFL players about returning to the United States now that NFL Europe is no more. Rochester and Detroit were specifically mentioned.
But a better scenario is for the CFL to start a northern New York State division. Buffalo and Rochester have populations of over one million. The Syracuse area has over 700,000 and the Albany area has 850,000.
Unlike the CFL’s previous American invasion, all these cities are close to the Canadian border, which makes travel easy to do and being close to the border; thus, they have more natural ties to Canada.
They would also be natural rivals for each other and draw fans on that basis. These four cities, plus potential expansion into New England in Hartford and Providence, could be a possible future path for the CFL.
The NFL doesn’t want such unglamourous cities. The CFL might as well have them.
